Not at all inappropriate; differentiations are part of the definitional process. (I see four or five different things to differentiate among here, so you may have seeded yet another entry - I'm also trying to cut back on making long comment-replies that ought to be posts in their own right on my own LJ.)

I would be one of those sex-pos anti-feminists, if I hadn't decided years back that every time I avoided the word "feminist" I was allowing others to define it.

Figleaf was instrumental in inspiring me to start spouting about feminism; I expect to make a lot of references to his ideas. So, yes, read Figleaf, everybody! If the brouhaha at Holly's hadn't come up, the first "I like RTF, but not on LJ; I'm HTMLing" post would have centred on my recommendation to read him.